Seahawks Future OT?

[D Hawk]

Easy fellas... :star-wars:

We won't be moving up - TB wants Suh or McCoy, the Redskins won't give up on getting their OT, and KC's needs are similar to ours and that will be too late for Okung. The cost is too much for Detroit. So - we get defense at 6 and OT at 14. Brown and Berry is better than #3 OT and whomever falls to 14.

 

[Fenom]

Nobody is worth a 6th and 14th, even Okung.

 

[mlemour]

Is Okung really much better than Williams of Oklahoma?

 

[dmarkholt12]

Is Okung really much better than Williams of Oklahoma?

Yes he is. WIlliams is very athletic, but hasnt proven he can even play LT at a high level.

 

[D Hawk]

Is Okung really much better than Williams of Oklahoma?

Yes. And most of the other "LTs" will either be OK at best or end up as OGs in the NFL. One of the next 6 will turn out to be a stud, but here's the problem... which one? I say it is Charles Brown, the guy that gave up no sacks in 2009 and 2 in 2008 - and against some very good talent. Some say it is Williams, other Brian "T-Rex" Bulaga, or Davis, or Campbell... I'm just not sold.

Sign Pitts, move Gibson back to T... ugh. I just have a feeling that the Seahawks have some surprise in store, because they've ignored a lot of FAs in positions of need that we could work on filling if not for the huge LT issue.

 

[sigpro]

Charles Brown will be the best LT in this years class, yes even better than Okung. Brown @ 14!!!!!!!!!

 

[SeahawkWag]

Yes he is. WIlliams is very athletic, but hasnt proven he can even play LT at a high level.

Williams has shown he can play at a high level
BUT he then takes the next 2 plays off