D Hawk;45344 said:This pick would be perfect if Ruskell was still here. Draft yet another O Lineman with a history of injuries. I know I'm in the minority here, but I'm not a Campbell fan. He's not as quick on the field as in his 40 time, he has been hurt both years, and I'm concerned about his dedication to conditioning. He has a lot of potential to be great, but he could very likely be a bust for a top 15 pick.
phaZe;45025 said:Is Chawks4life29's name suppose to be C Hawks or Chawks? I would have capitalized the H if I was him.
Back on topic...I need to think about what the Buccs needs. Probably gonna go defense.
D Hawk;45408 said:I'm just not a big fan of overlooking better players to fill an area of perceived need. That, and I don't see many LTs in this draft that will be able to start on day 1. Okung will, and will be a stud. But wrong on the rest of the OTs in this draft. At this point I'd even like to see them sign Pashos and gamble that he can be healthy again.
szat;45442 said:A guy who has seemed to be overlooked slightly but looked the most athletic aside from Campbell at the combine is Trent Williams.
How would fit with a Pete Carrol/Gibbs OL?
The Rams were the only team that could have used Bradford. Right now I'd say the Cardinals or Vikings could draft him. Both lost their starting QBs (I don't think Favre will come back) and the QBs they have left on the roster aren't that great.sigpro;45466 said:There is no way Bradford falls into the late first round, bad draft guys, someone should have taken him already!
phaZe;45467 said:The Rams were the only team that could have used Bradford. Right now I'd say the Cardinals or Vikings could draft him. Both lost their starting QBs (I don't think Favre will come back) and the QBs they have left on the roster aren't that great.
szat;45491 said:No... Sig is right Bradford should have been picked up multiple times.
Rams, Hawks, Browns, Bills, Jags, 49ers were all canidates.